Answer:
[-2,-3]
Step-by-step explanation:
In component vertex form: [-2,-3]
Your numbers are all over the place, I will assume that you are saying that the slope is 13.
Looking at the formula for calculating slope/gradient, it is Rise/Run.
Rise/Run = y2 - y1 divided by x2 - x1. The reason for this is because if you minus one y value from the other y value you get the difference in values which is the rise, and if you minus one x value from the other x value you get the difference in value which is the run.
So by using this formula, you get:
(7 - 6) / (v - 9) = 13
Therefore 1/(v - 9) = 13
If you multiply both sides by (v-9), you get 1= 13v - 117
you rearrange it to 13v = 118
If you divide by 13, you get your answer = 9.0769
You can check your answer by putting this value back into the gradient formula.
(7-6)/(9.0769-9)
=13.004
One equation that you could make is 5+2-(-3)
Answer:
Relative frequency
0.214
0.268
0.446
0.071
Total 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The relative frequency is computed by dividing the individual frequencies to the sum of frequencies.
sum of frequencies=12+15+25+4=56
Class Relative Frequency
10-20 12/56=0.214
20-30 15/56=0.268
30-40 25/56=0.446
40-50 4/56=0.071
Total 12/56+15/56+25/56+4/56=56/56=1
Answer:
What do Americans think about preferential hiring of women? Has there been a change in the past decade? In 2000(group 1) and 2010(Group 2), the General Social Survey asked participants if they would favor or oppose preferential hiring of women. In 2000, out of 849 respondents, 271 said yes. In 2010, out of 696 respondents, 225 said yes. The 95% confidence interval for p1-p2 is (-0.0509, 0.04273). What would be an appropriate conclusion? O We are 95% confident that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2000 is 0.04723. We are 95% confident that the pulation proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is about 0.0509 and the population proportion in 2010 is 0.04723. We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2010 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2000. O We are 95% confidence that the population proportion in 2000 that supported preferential hiring of women is between 0.0509 less to 0.04273 more than the population proportion in 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
