12 to 16 because all ratios are equivalent
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because if you look at the expression, there is no term that is raised to the cube root. As a result, this isn't a cubic polynomial. However, this would be a quadratic polynomial cause the highest raised exponent is 2, which is the number for quadratic.
If you liked my response, please consider giving me a Brainliest! Thanks!
A). 39⁄64 × 8⁄13 ====> 39 / 64 * 8 / 13 ===> 312/832 ==> 3 / 8 (Decimal: 0.375).
B). 2⁄3 × 1⁄5 × 4⁄7 ==> 2/3 * 1/5 * 4/7 ====> 8 / 105 ===> (Decimal: 0.07619)
C). 3⁄5 × 10⁄12 × 1⁄2 ===> 3/5 * 10/12 ===> 30/60 ===> 1/2 ==> 1/2 * 1/2 ===> 1/4 (Decimal: 0.25)
D). 4⁄9 × 54 ===> 4 * 54/ 9.1 ====> 216/9 ===> 24/1 ===> 24
E). 20 × 3 1⁄5 ===> 20 * 16/ 1.5 ====>320/5 ====> 64/1 =====> 64
F). 11 × 2 7⁄11 ====> 319/11 ====> 29/1 ======> 29
G). 5 1⁄3 × 5 1⁄8 ==> 16/3 * 41/8 ==> 656/24 ==> 82/3 ==> 27 1/3 ==> (Decimal: 27.33333)
H). 10 2⁄3 × 1 3⁄8 ===> 32/3 * 11/8 ===> 44 / 3 ===> 14 2/3 ==> (Decimal: 14.666667)
Hope that helps!!!! : )
