Explanation:
I know right!! its annoyinggg
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
treating the bomb soviet union ships if the ussr did not remove their missiles
Well you should start off with ground beef and you mush it up with your hands then you get seasoning most stores have seasoning but if you don't have that look for Tex Mex or any other seasoning you have. cook it on a pan. get a bowl put your beef in the bowl and put your seasoning on it and mix. Please use this platform for homework but nevertheless, hopefully I helped.
