The bill of rights was to state individuals rights so the answer would be "C. The founding fathers wanted to guarantee citizens certain freedoms"
Answer:
The statement made by the charge which is an example of ethnocentrism is as follow:
"Italians are best at doing everything."
Explanation:
Ethnocentrism:
In social sciences, ethnocentrism is a term that describes the attitude of an individual who believe his or her cultural values are superior than the other cultures and he is the best among them.
- In this given scenario, charge nurse claim such a statement in which she shows that their people are best and they can do anything.
D) Islam but i think they spell it Quran.
Answer: Nyctalopia: night blindness
Explanation:
Nyctalopia is an abnormality characterized with an inability to see dim light or at night.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
