The answer to this question is active style of listening
active style of listening involves direct focus and attention to whoever your communication partner is.
Nodding his hands appropirately after a certain response could be used as an indicator because it indicates that fred making a conscious effort to listen to the communication partner.
Answer:
1) Debit Bank $11787069 Debit bond discount $912931 ; Credit Bond $12700000
2) Debit Interest expense $751293 ; Credit Bank $660,000 Credit Discount on Bond payable $91293
3 )Debit interest expense $ 751293 ; Credit bank 660000, Credit discount on bond payable $91293
b)Interest expense = $1502586
c)It is because a financial crisis might have happened prior to issuing the bond and the company still went ahead with issuing even though the rate has changed.
Explanation:
interest expense = 12000000 * 0.11 * 6/12=$660000
discount on bond payable = $912931 /5 = 182586 /2= 91293
Interest expense = $751293 * 2 = $1502586
Answer:
a) Absolute Value Inequality => Absolute(0 + y) < 2
b) -2 < y < 2
Which means, Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible.
Explanation:
<u><em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department.
</em></u>
<em>a) Absolute Value Equation:</em>
Absolute(0 + y) < 2
where y represent the location of the new house and 0 represents the location of the fire department.
Furthermore,
<em>Absolute(0 + y) < 2 = (0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is +ve. </em>
and
<em>Absolute(0+y) <2 = -(0 + x) < 2 when (0 + y) is -ve.
</em>
b) When (0 + y) is +ve,
we have, (0 + y) < 2.
<em>Solving for y and subtracting 0 from both sides. </em>
0-0 + y < 2 - 0
<em>y < 2</em>
and when (0 + y) is -ve,
<em>we have, - (0 + y) < 2.
</em>
Solving for y:
- 0 - y < 2
multiplying negative from both sides
<em>y > - 2</em>
<em>So, we have -2 < y < 2 </em>
<em>Johnson Family has to live within the range of -2 to +2 from the fire department. Otherwise, they will have to pay 500 USD as increased deductible. </em>
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is <span>worldcom try to structure the transactions to get a “step-up” in the tax bases of mci’s assets because he doesn't have enough influence to do so.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
