For number 2 you could say for in favor of the act was it made the tea cheaper and would make colonists purchase it or that it helped bail out the east India company so they weren’t in debt. But against the tea act you can say many colonist opposed it because it seemed to validate the townshend tax on tea or in other words kinda you can said colonists believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to “no taxation without representation”
Answer:
The person is using the B. Yale attitude change approach.
Explanation:
The Yale attitude change approach suggests that an individual is most likely to <em>change his/her attitudes</em> due to persuasive messages.
There are many factors which should be taken into account , such as the <em>attractiveness</em> of the individual giving the message, the <em>attention and quality </em>of the message, amongst others.
In this case, we can see that the individual is saying that actors make effective spoke people for potato chips based on their attractiveness, meaning that an individual is most likely to change his/her attitude about the chips based on this factor.
Peloponnesus this is the answer if it wasnt in the south it would be Sparta but in the south this is the answer peloponnesus
they need workers i guess
