315 m²
<u><em>area of rec + area of rec + area of rec + area of triangle</em></u>
⇒ length + width + length + width + length + width + 1/2 * base * height
⇒ 19 * 6 + 9 * 9 + 18 * 5 + 1/2 * 12 * 5
⇒ 90 + 30 + 81 + 114
⇒ 315 m²
Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
it is d
Answer:
385-13x
Step-by-step explanation:
that is my answer
You could get two different functions out of this:
<u>2x + 2y = 8</u>
1). <u> 'y' as a function of 'x'</u>
Subtract 2x from each side: 2y = -2x + 8
Divide each side by 2 : <em> y = -x + 4</em>
2). <u> 'x' as a function of 'y' :</u>
Subtract 2y from each side: 2x = -2y + 8
Divide each side by 2 : <em> x = -y + 4</em>
Those two functions look the same, but that's just because the original
equation given in the problem was so symmetrical. In general, they're
not the same function.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
The question has no division answer. That makes C and D incorrect.
A for some reason is backwards. It makes no sense to use that. You are left with B. The reason A or B is correct is that the burn of calories must get larger with an increase in hours.
