The equation of the line will be (assuming the y-intercept equal to zero):
y = 2.5*x
<h3>
What is Tahila's mistake?</h3>
We know that we have a linear equation of the form:
y = a*x + b
Such that we know that the line passes through (-3, -7.5), notice that the proposed equation is:
y = 0.5*x
If you evaluate that in -3, you get:
y = 0.5*-3 = -1.5
So this line does not pass through (-3, -7.5).
If we assume that b = 0 in the linear equation, then we can find the value of a as:
-7.5 = a*-3
a = 7.5/3 = 2.5
Then the linear equation is:
y = 2.5*x
If you want to learn more about linear equations:
brainly.com/question/1884491
#SPJ1
500000000 is <span>5 x 108 is </span><span>scientific notation
</span>0.0000008<span> written in scientific </span>notation<span> is 8 × 10 </span>–<span>7</span>
2a/5b = 6
(2a-5b)/5b could be written as: (2a/5b) -(5b/5b)
Repace by its equivalent value (6) -(1) = 5
So,, there are 5 different flavors. A total of 180 people were asked. Hence, the hypothesis that there is no significant difference is that every flavor gets 180/5=36 flavors. x^2=
. In this case, mi is the proportion of the hypothesis, thus 36, n=180 and xi is the number of actual observations. Substituting the known quantities, we get that x^2=9. The degree of association is given by
. This yields around 0.10, much higher than our limit.
