I believe the answer is D) Tuberculosis - Hope it helps! If It is wrong, Im truly sorry. :D
<span />
The Taft-Hartley Act (also called the Labor Relations Management Act of 1947), which defends workers and their rights, and has avoided many strikes since its inception, has been reformed and amended many times throughout its time of life, has been the cause of legal battles, and even a veto of President Truman, which was annulled by the Senate: demonstrates how the Constitution and its Acts are reformed, laws are debated, and seeks to achieve adjustment and review of each law of the Constitution year by year, regardless of the strong political and legal struggle that this represents.
Answer:
The statement is describing the usual difference in trade policy that exists between monarchies and republics.
Explanation:
The excerpt comes from the Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, who was a French philosopher who promoted republicanism and liberalism.
In the text, Montesqueiu is explaining than in monarchies, trade is very restricted, and is usually only allowed for luxury goods like perfums, spices, or silk clothes, because these goods are used by the nobility as a symbol of their power and status.
In monarchies, for the rest of the population, trade is restricted. The common people therefore cannot access goods from abroad, or can only do so at a very high cost.
In republics, Montesquieu says, trade tends to be more open. Merchants become the ones who do most of the trade, guided by their economic ideas. The merchants therefore obtain many goods from abroad, that both the nobility and the commoner can acquire for a lower price.
In conclusion, Montesquieu is using the argument for trade as another reason to support republics over monarchies.
Answer:
World War I Germany's unfettered submarine warfare against American ships during World War I provoked the U.S. into abandoning the neutrality it had upheld for so many years. The country's resultant participation in World War I against the Central Powers marked its first major departure from isolationist policy.
Explanation:
Answer:
They ensured a huge free-state like California while giving the regions a chance to decide in favor of themselves.
They trusted the regions would cast a ballot to permit subjugation.
They trusted that if the regions cast a ballot to permit subjugation they would hold an enormous populace and various states the regions made up more land than California.