35 Points Please!!!!!!!! I'll mark Brainliest!!!

Why did the pilgrims think they would be successful in Massachusetts

Murrr4er [49]

<span>During the reign of King Henry VIII in the 1500s, he established the Church of England --- a new church that carried different practices from the Roman Catholic Church. And that time, he mandated all the residents in England to be part of this new church. The pilgrims were not open to this new mandate as they wanted to have the freedom to observe their religion. With this in mind, they decided to leave England and go to America where they will be able to start a new colony and be able to live and worship as Christians.</span>

To add to this, given that they will be leaving as a community with their families in tow, they believed that they would flourish altogether. During that time as well, the Pilgrims were in talks with financial investors who could possibly provide the means for them to start a new life in America.

These are the reasons why they felt that they would be successful in America.

6 0

4 years ago

Mark Yes if the statement is a reason people wanted to restrict immigration. Mark No if it is not.

Troyanec [42]

The answer will be yes

3 0

4 years ago

Drag each description to the correct category.

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer: New England Colonies (Exported Items to the Caribbean in exchange for raw sugar) and (The cities of Boston and providence served are shipping ports)

Southern Colonies (Maintained large population or slaves) and economy was largely based on agriculture

Explanation:

Yes

4 0

3 years ago

I need help pleaseee!

Paul [167]

Answer:The effect of WWI on the US economy was considerable. There are two effects that the war had on the US economy: short term, and long term.

For the short term effect the US economy grew in the buildup to the war and during its prosecution. From 1915 the US made tons of loans to the UK to help them in their war effort. It is not a stretch to say that WWI was the major factor in contributing to the "Roaring 20s" when the US economy boomed. After the peace the economy dropped temporarily and this is most likely attributable to the stopping of war material production. However, at that point in the timeline the US was the only country that had not been completely devastated by the effects of the war. US companies were able to expand their reach around the world, and domestic consumption in the US increased, hence the name "The Roaring 20s." So the short term effect (I am defining short term effect as within one decade) was that the US economy grew a large amount due to their involvement in WWI.

The long term effect was that US involvement in the war lead directly to the Great Depression and WWII. The Treaty of Versailles led to a system where the US was cashing in its wartime loans to the UK, which in turn was using the wartime reparations it received from Germany to pay off the US. This system collapsed when the Germany economy succumbed to hyperinflation and died. That paired with Black Tuesday, which was driven by rampant stock speculation from tons of US citizens flush with cash led to the Great Depression. Since the world was still reeling from the effects of WWI when Germany fell, everything else fell apart. This event was directly attributable to WWI.

So in short there was a huge effect on the US economy in the short term which lead to the Roaring 20s, but the growth was short lived as it was built upon the same conditions that brought about the Great Depression.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following correctly describes the difference in Francis Bacon and René Descartes' approach to science?

natka813 [3]

Rene Descartes is frequently considered the first modern philosopher. His first publication, Discourse on Method (1637), was the touchstone of the scientific method. A response to the lack of clarity he saw in the world of science, Discourse describes how scientific study should be prosecuted so as to achieve the utmost clarity, by using deductive reasoning to test hypotheses. Descartes explained that the test of an alleged truth is the clarity with which it may be apprehended, or proven. "I think, therefore I am," (cogito ergo sum) is Descartes' famous example of the most clearly apprehended truth. In effect, the evidence of thought proves the hypothesis of existence.

Descartes dabbled extensively in the study of cosmology and the nature of matter, developing theories on the make up of matter and the formulation and operation of heavenly bodies. Though Descartes' astronomical explanation failed to account for many observed phenomena, his great prestige propelled his theory into fashion among the educated elite intellectuals of Europe. Descartes was even about to publish a book on cosmology, entitled The World, in 1653, when he heard of Galileo Galilei's condemnation by the Church and thought better of it. Descartes tried to apply his physical theories and expand upon them in his works on human anatomy, which, though pioneering in some respects, were largely erroneous. He further wrote about the spiritual nature of man and theorized about the existence of the soul. The Cartesian philosophy (derived from his name, Descartes) won many followers during the seventeenth century.

Francis Bacon, also called Lord Verulam, was somewhat less renowned and less successful than Descartes, but nevertheless highly influential. Bacon advocated the collection of all possible facts and phenomena and the processing of these through a sort of automatic logical mill. Bacon warned scientists against four famous false notions, called Idols.

1. Idols of the Tribe were fallacies in humankind, most notably man's proneness to believe that nature was ordered to a higher degree than it actually was.

2. Idols of the Cave were misconceptions inherent in individuals' thoughts, spawned by private prejudices.

3. Idols of the Marketplace were errors that arose from received systems of thought.

1 2

ADVANCEMENTS IN MATHEMATICS (1591-1655)

Video SparkNotes: Joseph Conrad's…

‹ Previous Next ›

More

3 0

4 years ago