Answer:
taking a closer look at the natural world
Explanation:
using prior knowledge is basic common sense. so no.
requiring evidence and thinking logically is following a rule. so no.
following strict rules when using human test subjects. right off the bat, "strict rules" is an immediate no.
taking a closer look at the natural world. that's creative because they look for the answer around them.
If you are doing edginuity. *Fats are a type of lipid*. <Correct Answer>
The answer is 9%.
To calculate this we will use some <span>formulas of the Hardy-Weinberg principle:
</span><span>p² + 2pq + q² = 1 and <span>p + q = 1
where:
</span></span>
<span>p - the frequency of the A allele.
q - the frequency of the a allele.</span>
p² - the frequency of dominant homozygote (with AA genotype)
2pq - the frequency of heterozygote (with Aa genotype)
<span>q² - the frequency of recessive homozygote (with aa genotype)</span>
<span>We know:</span>
p = 70% = 70/100 = 0.7
q = 30% = 30/100 = 0.3
We need to calculate the frequency of the genotype aa:
q² = ?
Since we know the frequency of allele q, it is easy to calculate the frequency of the genotype aa:
q² = 0.3² = 0.09 = 0.09 · 100% = 9%
I have no idea because I am just on here to find answers myself
