I'm pretty certain A is correct
Answer: According to research males who carried weapons were three times more likely to be victimized as those who did not.
Explanation:
A weapon has a way of giving a sign that someone is ready for violence and the perpetrators of violence will be drawn to pushing that person's buttons in order to see how they will respond .
Mostly when teenagers carry a weapon they sometimes feel powerful and stronger and they may tend to be provocative towards others around them as they do this they may be killed in the process by the more experienced people .
He didnt think the US should tie themselves to any European power.
issues could come about if England wanted to get involved in any territories.
if they sided with one Britian it Would be directly hypocritical of their practice and staement about being free from European affairs being seperate entities.it would go against their statement of being independent from foreign affairs
The correct answer is: "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing". This fact can be seen in the case of Russian journalist S, who forgot very little but, because of this ability, had difficulty with <em>abstract</em> thinking.
Abstract thinking is defined as the capacity of to think about ideas, facts, objects, thoughts, and principles that are not physical. Theses ideas are abstract because they escape the concept of "here and now" and take thinking to a deeper more symbolic level.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
