Answer:
Ambas as colônias do norte e do sul tinham diferentes tipos de ocupações.
Explanation:
A principal ocupação das colônias do norte foi o corte de árvores. A partir desses bosques, eles constroem casas para morar e também constroem navios, enquanto as pessoas das colônias do sul eram costureiras, padeiros, ferreiros, sapateiros e fazendeiros. Eles também têm um grande número de escravos, o que ajuda no seu trabalho. Os comerciantes e os plantadores eram elite social e presentes no topo da escada social, enquanto os escravos estavam presentes no fundo da escada social. Essas duas colônias tinham muitas diferenças, mas podem ser unidas para formar um único país, porque sabiam que sua unidade as torna fortes contra seus inimigos e boas para seus países de várias maneiras.
They were the start and base of law and order dating back to 450 BC.
Answer:
2 and 4
Could you please help me with the recent question of mine unanswered on my page? I will give u brainliest and 20 points! :))) X
Explanation:
Hello, this question is about the article "Africans Migration to Colonial America"
Answer:
They began to dominate the land by learning the languages present in North America, getting to know the region and making connections with local residents.
Explanation:
Those who were privileged to survive Middle Passage created the new land because they were able to establish themselves efficiently in North America.
First, they learned the languages spoken in the region, so it would be possible to make connections with local residents. These connections were established through friendships and even joining lineages through marriages, agreements and other things, which allowed the survivors to establish themselves and create a promising environment for themselves and their descendants.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
