Answer:
because it rewrote federal law over the objections of Congress,
Explanation:
Seven states, including Texas, sued the federal government in May 2018 arguing that DACA was unconstitutional because <u>it rewrote federal law over the objections of Congress</u>.
Answer: Castilian, Catalan, Galician, Basque
Explanation:
Answer: The unintended, undesirable effect is morally tolerable if it brings a good result.
Explanation: The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm.
According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end.
In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on credit was that if the stock dropped, borrowers have to make up the difference.
When the stock dropped, basically the borrowers losing an amount of value of his assets. But since he bought the stock before the price was dropped, he had to make up the difference
I believe choice #4 is the correct answer. The Supreme Court deemed the schools “separate, but not equal.” Therefore, choice #4 is correct.
