A major step in reunifying the kingodms in Spain was the fact that Ferdinand and Isabella were married - c.
This brought together two major factions which were active and important political players in Spain and made Spain a kingdom which was more united than before.
Answer: An example of how individual actions are constrained by sociological circumstances is (D) David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it.
Explanation: The concept "sociological circumstance" is used to refer to<u> the social factors, such as ideas, principles or activities, that surround and have an influence on a particular individual.</u> In that way, sociological circumstances limit a person's behaviour and actions. David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it is an example of a constraint generated by a sociological circumstance because<u> the principles of the religion he believes in and that surrounds him restrict his choices.</u> In other words, <u>his religion limits the way in which David is supposed to act and eat. </u>
Nacirema", which satirizes anthropological papers on "other" cultures, and the culture of the United States. Horace Mitchell Miner wrote the paper and originally published it in the June 1956 edition of American Anthropologist.
The correct answer is total communication. Total
communication is defined as a philosophy of being able to educate children that
have hearing loss and that it engages to incorporating total or all means of
communication such as natural gestures, finger spelling, signs, or even body
language.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
