The appropriate response is extrinsic motivation. This alludes to conduct that is driven by outside prizes, for example, cash, popularity, evaluations, and acclaim. This sort of inspiration emerges from outside the person, rather than natural inspiration, which starts within the person.
This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
Answer:
They had originally used the natives to do their laborious work but do to disease, and harsh working conditions the majority of them died. They needed a new cheap labor force and that's when the Spanish began to use <u>African</u> slaves.
Answer:
The Last Supper I'm pretty sure.
Explanation:
NORTH: Citizens supported a stronger federal government. Immigrants filled the need for labor. <span>Manufacturers needed cotton for textile mills.
</span><span>
SOUTH: </span>Citizens supported a stronger state government. Slaves met the need for labor. Citizens needed to import manufactured goods.
