Answer:
Investment theory of creativity
Explanation:
Researchers Robert Sternberg and Todd Lubart have proposed a theory called the <u>investment theory of creativity</u>. According to the authors, creative people are like good investors: they buy low and sell high. Their research show that creative ideas are rejected as bizarre or ridiculous by most people when they first come out, and thus they are worth little. Creative people are willing to champion these ideas that are not generally accepted, and it is in this sense that they are "buying low". They try hard to convince other people of the value of the new idea, and eventually they turn them into supported and high value ideas. Creative people "sell high" when they move on from the now generally accepted idea on to the next unpopular but promising idea.
A real world example of this theory was famous filmmaker Stanley Kubrick. When most of his movies first came out, they usually were met with mixed or negative reviews, as was the case of films like <em>A Clockwork Orange </em>(1971) or <em>The Shining </em>(1980). However, after a few years, they were widely recognized as cinematic masterpieces.
It was the victory battle of Stranglad that lent optimism to the Nazi German troops in early 1942. Together with their allies, they were fighting against the Soviet Union for taking control Stanglad which is found in the southern part of Russia.
Answer:
Rosenfeld, a lead author on the research and a professor of sociology in the School of Humanities and Sciences, drew on a nationally representative 2017 survey of American adults and found that about 39 percent of heterosexual couples reported meeting their partner online, compared to 22 percent in 2009.
Explanation:
<h3>
♫ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~Hello There!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♫</h3>
➷ He has 'reward' power over her.
<h3><u>
✽</u></h3>
➶ Hope This Helps You!
➶ Good Luck (:
➶ Have A Great Day ^-^
↬ ʜᴀɴɴᴀʜ ♡
Answer:
Describes Local community Responses.
Negotiating better terms of engagement.
Embracing new opportunities.
Fighting detrimental change.
Does not describe local community responses
ignoring the effects of globalization.
Explanation:
