Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
In this question, there are no options given to choose from. This makes it harder to answer the question accurately. Still i hope my answer satisfies you. The rule of law serves as a long term protection against tyranny and is a foundation of liberty in the United States of America. The rule of law helps to maintain peace within the country.
The watch has a designer and is intricate. He compares the world to a watch and notes that it is even more intricate. As a result, it must also have a designer, and since only God is capable of creating the universe, God must therefore be real.
<h3>What are the three basic arguments in favor of God's existence?</h3>
Natural theology is the attempt to offer arguments or proofs for the existence of God. The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments have historically been the three main points of this endeavor.
<h3>What are the key arguments for design?</h3>
The typical structure of a design argument is as follows: (1) a premise that asserts that the material universe demonstrates some empirical property F; (2) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts (or concludes) that F is convincing evidence of intelligent design or purpose; and (3) a premise (or sub-argument) that asserts that F is an empirical property that the material universe exhibits.
To Know more about demonstrates
brainly.com/question/10452434
#SPJ13
Village industries
teachers
schools
The answer is c. never a good idea and should always be avoided.
