1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet [91]
2 years ago
11

Which of the following best explains the result of slave codes during the colonial era? Slave codes increased the rights of ensl

aved people. Slave codes eliminated the rights of enslaved people. Slave codes ensured that enslaved people were treated fairly. Slave codes ensured that slaveholders could not free enslaved workers.
History
2 answers:
mojhsa [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B. Slave codes eliminated the rights of enslaved people.

Explanation:

Ratling [72]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<u>B - Slave codes eliminated the rights of enslaved people.</u>

Explanation: Got it Right on the Quiz, Hope this Helps :)

You might be interested in
Why was the opium war significant for britain
umka21 [38]

The two Opium Wars, fought from 1839-1842 and 1856-1860, have been understood by the Chinese as the beginning of their "Century of Humiliation" at the hands of Western powers, most notably Britain. 

Early in the nineteenth century, an insatiable appetite for Chinese goods, such as tea, silk and china, led Britain into a trade deficit with China. To combat that, Britain significantly increased its opium trade with China. It used opium from India, which it controlled, to finance its purchases of Chinese goods. The Chinese government, seeing the extent to which opium addiction was affecting its people, decided to enforce its ban on the opium trade. In turn, England found excuses to go to war with China and easily defeated the badly weakened country. It then imposed harsh and humiliating treaties on the Chinese, which included payment of indemnities and forcing the Chinese to cede Hong Kong to the British. Although Britain, at the time the premier world power, spearheaded the effort, other Western powers also made lucrative inroads into China.

The Opium Wars could be seen as a moral low point for Britain in its zest to exploit the resources and peoples of other nations. The Chinese tried in vain to appeal to Queen Victoria to ban the sale of opium on moral grounds, and Gladstone, the British prime minister, decried the trade as evil.

The legacy of these two wars was years of distrust in China. In the latter half of the twentieth century, the country became communist and turned inward, taking control of its own destiny and growing into a major world power determined to protect its interests in Asia. The legacy also arguably impacted twentieth-century world politics: the English and French imposed similarly humiliating terms, the Versailles treaty, on the Germans after World War I, which did not go over well with Germany, and although the period of profitable imperialism was waning, Hitler waged war in part to build a similar empire to what the British had. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which mean of communication allows two-way communication between the policymakers and people who might want to influence the pol
Basile [38]

Hello I believe the answer is C. social media  Hope this helped

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the peasants believed they could use Luther’s ideas as reason to revolt? What about his ideas(“priesthood of al
sergiy2304 [10]
Ehhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdjdh
8 0
2 years ago
What changes came about as a result of the Commercial Revolution?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Hey!

I can tell you some things, but if it isn't what you're looking for, I apologize for that!

Explanation:

<h2><u>Commercial Revolution</u></h2>

First, the Commercial Revolution changed Europe from a local economy to a global one. Before the revolution, most goods were produced for family use or to be sold within local towns and villages. Other than a few traveling merchants, there was really no way to peddle goods to a larger population.

However, once trade routes blossomed between European countries and their colonies, a whole new market opened up.

Realizing there was money to be made, people began producing goods to be sold outside of their small communities. In other words, the incentive for profit replaced simply producing for survival.

These new markets and their high demand for goods led to large businesses replacing individual production of goods. As money poured in from this new global trade, Europe continued to transform. The Commercial Revolution also caused a population explosion.

Simply put, as wealth flooded the continent, it allowed for larger families. In turn, these larger families created a work force to sustain and grow Europe's new global economy. Of course, as these new markets opened up, European business owners needed a way to deal with all their money! This brings us to the formation of banks and joint-stock companies.

<h2><u>Definition</u></h2>

<u>Joint-Stock Company</u>- A joint-stock company is a business organization in which shares of the company's stock can be bought and sold by shareholders. Each shareholder owns company stock in a quantity, evidenced by their shares. Shareholders are able to transfer their shares to others without any effects to the continued existence of the company.

<h2><u>Mercantilism</u></h2>

Under mercantilism, colonies were only allowed to import from or export to the European country that governed them.

For instance, if Jamestown, governed by England, wanted to import wool from the Dutch, they could not. Even if the Dutch price was substantially cheaper, Jamestown was stuck buying wool from England. Further hamstringing the Jamestown colonists, all the goods produced by the colonies went to England. England then sold the goods to other countries at a substantial markup, which the crown, not the colonists, kept! In other words, the colonies did the work, while England reaped the profit.

It's like a poor kid squeezing fresh lemons for eight hours, only to have her parents commandeer the lemonade stand! For those of us growing up in the American school system, this ill-treatment of the colonists is a familiar tale. However, we weren't told how the system of mercantilism transformed Europe.

7 0
2 years ago
Which group benefited most from the shift to assembly line production during the Second Industrial Revolution?
vovangra [49]
I’m pretty sure it’s unskilled immigrants :))
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the key issues involved in the compromise made over slavery
    8·1 answer
  • In ancient Rome, the wealthy noble citizens were known as plebians. patricians. helots. zealots.
    11·1 answer
  • Name the four elections where the popular vote did not determine the presidency.
    5·1 answer
  • All of the following institutions award certificates except
    12·2 answers
  • What was the primary reason for the economy that occur in the united states after world war two
    14·1 answer
  • The area in which the law of demand best applies is
    11·1 answer
  • Angela is a musician who writes short musical pieces for use in religious services and nonreligious festivals
    12·1 answer
  • What was Texas before it became a state of the U.S.?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Roosevelt think he was justified in cutting federal spending in 1937?
    6·2 answers
  • Help help help help history please
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!