Answer:
the annual rate of return is 15.24%
Explanation:
The computation of the annual rate of return is shown below:
Given that
NPER = 5
PV = -$15,000
PMT = $4,500
FV = $0
The formula is shown below:
= RATE(NPER,PMT,-PV,FV,TYPE)
AFter applying the above formula, the annual rate of return is 15.24%
Answer:
$4,392
Explanation:
Sunland Company
Therefore the costs are eliminated if they outsource the manufacturing:
Direct materials $9,576
Direct labor $12,882
Variable overhead $14,364
Total $36,882
Their new cost is ($2.85 X 11,400) $32,490
$36,882 - $32,490 = $4,392
If Sunland accepts the offer the net income increase (decrease) by $4,392
Answer:
20 years (scenario A) and 16 years (scenario B)
Explanation:
The real GDP will double in "n" number of years, with "n" estimated by interpolation using the formula below.
In the solutions below, we assumed current GDP to be 1, and as a result, the GDP will double to 2.
Scenario A
When you substitute 20 for "n" in the left hand side (LHS) of the equation, you will arrive at 1.99 which is approximately equal to 2. Any number below 20 will result in a number less than 2.
Thus, with an average annual real GDP growth rate of 3.5%, real GDP will double in about 20 years.
Scenario B
When you substitute 16 for "n" in the left hand side (LHS) of the equation, you will arrive at 2.02 which is approximately equal to 2. Any number below 16 will result in a number less than 2.
Thus, with an average annual real GDP growth rate of 4.5%, real GDP will double in about 16 years.
What this agent has to do should be to advise the buyer that there may be special assessments levied against property.
<h3>Who is a house agent?</h3>
This is a person that acts as a third party to a person that wants to buy or rent a house and the person that is giving out the property.
The agent here has to tell the buyer that the reason for these taxes is the fact that there are other levies on the property.
Read more on house agents here:brainly.com/question/13957036
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.