Answer: Degree of Operating Leverage
A Tech = 2.75
Z Tech = 3
Explanation:
As defined in question itself,
Degree of Operating Leverage = 
As here, it is provided that profit for both the companies are same amounting $4 million.
Although the fixed cost differ by $1 million.
A Tech Degree of operating Leverage = 1 + 
= 2.75
Z Tech Degree of Operating Leverage = 1 + 
= 3
This clearly demonstrates that A Tech will reach its break even faster than the Z Tech as the ratio of fixed cost to variable cost is lower in A tech in comparison to Z Tech.
Answer: Mirror image rule
Explanation:
It should be noted that the contract formation defenses are fraud, illegality, incapacity, unconscionability, duress and statute of Frauds.
The mirror image rule is not among the defense to the formation of w contract. It implies that an offer should be accepted with no changes made to the offer.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Price discrimination is when the same product is sold at different prices to customers in different markets
types of price discrimination
1. first degree price discrimination : here sellers charge each consumer at their willingness to pay in order to eliminate consumer surplus.
2. second degree price discrimination : here firms offer different prices depending on the quantity purchased. e.g. giving discounts for bulk purchases.
3, third degree price discrimination : firms charge different prices to different groups of customers. e.g. having a certain price for senior citizens, students
Answer: closer to
Explanation:
Emerging economies also referred to as developing countries or emerging markets are countries which are investing in more in their productive capacity ans are also gradually moving away from agriculture as it main occupation and there is increase in industrialization.
Due to emerging markets, the world is moving closer to an economic system that is more favorable for international business. There are more quality goods produced by nations and advancement in technology has also helped the economy.
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
