Answer: A. Impossibility of performance
Explanation:
Impossibility of contract is a doctrine where by a contract is rendered invalid on the bases of uncontrollable circumstances which renders performance of contract impossible. Impossibility of performance can be difficult to prove.
Answer: a. Railroad loading
Explanation:
This question relates to the BCG matrix which allows a company with multiple divisions to know how to deal with its various divisions based on their growth rate and market share.
The question specifically relates to a matrix called "Cash cows". Cash cows are divisions that have a significant market share but a low growth rate. These divisions are stable and bring more money into the company than they cost to run.
This allows us to take profits from them and invest in other. The Railroad loading controls a significant market share of 75% but has a low growth rate so is a Cash cow.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": multiple systematic risk factors.
Explanation:
The Arbitrage Pricing Theory or APT weights the influence of different macroeconomic factors on an asset return. If the asset's price is different than the model's projection an opportunistic investor can buy and sell the asset for a profit. Those macroeconomic factors can include economic output, unemployment, inflation, savings or investments-specific considerations and they capture systematic risk.
Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.