Answer:
Annual demand (U) = 90.000 bags
Cost of each bag = $1.50
Inventory carrying cost per unit(C) = $1.50 × 20% = 0 30
Ordering cost per unit (O) = $15
Part A)



EOQ = 3,000
Part B)
Maximum inventory = EOQ + Safety inventory on hand
Maximum inventory = 3000 + 1000
Maximum inventory = 4.000
Part C)
Average inventory = Maximum inventory + Minimum or Safety /2
Average inventory = 4,000 + 1,000 / 2
Average inventory =2,500
Part D)
How often company order = Annual demand / EOQ
How often company order = 90,000 / 3.000
How often company order = 30
Answer:
D. Holding cost per unit per year is dependent on the selling price per unit.
Explanation:
The formulas are shown below:
Economic order quantity:
=
The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
If in the question, the carrying cost is given in the percentage than the per unit cost is come after multiplying it with the selling price per unit
Since Isamu carefully controls costs by ordering in bulk, limiting labor costs, and renting the additional space in his building to another business, then he is an example of an efficient manager.
An efficient manager refers to a manager that uses limited resources in order to do a particular job in a professional manner.
It should be noted that an efficient manager identifies his or her priorities and develop structures to accomplish the objectives. In this case, Isamu carefully manages the available resources, therefore, he's an <em>efficient manager</em>.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25383149
Answer:
The correct option is A, risk averse
Explanation:
Risk aversion is a situation where a person undertaking a business or an investor tries as much as possible to limit exposure to losses by taking drastic steps to ensure the losses do not materialize.
The publisher in this case is conscious of facing the lawsuit that could result from publishing story and has taken a precautionary measure by not even venturing into the publishing ,let alone a lawsuit with substantial amount in damages rears its ugly head.
A risk seeking investor would go ahead with the publishing since success could bring a juicy income