Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
Mass of electron:9.109 times 10^-31 kg
mass of proton: 1.673 times 10-27
speed of light=3.0 times 10^8
avogadro's number 6.02 times 10^32
planck's constant: 6.63 times 10^-34
just google chem constants sheet
Answer:
x ≥ $40
Step-by-step explanation:
Jackie didn't spend more than $40 on a video.
x ≥ $40
Answer:
Eight times ten plus six times one plus two times one-tenth plus seven times one-thousandth.
Step-by-step explanation:
(8 x 10) = eight times ten
(6 x 1) = six times one
(2 x 0.1) = two times one-tenth
(7 x 0.001) = seven times one-thousandth
I am not always the best with the equations to words stuff, so please comment if I am wrong!