Answer:
no, because for x=-3, y would have to be -31
Step-by-step explanation:
boy oh boy (or girl oh girl) - you wrote this in a horrible, horrible format.
I can only guess what your problem and the fitting answer would be.
y = -2×x^2 + 3×x - 4
-4 = -2×(-3)^2 + 3×(-3) - 4
-4 = -2×9 - 9 - 4
-4 = -18 - 9 - 4
-4 = -31
and that is wrong. for (-3,-4) to be on the graph of the function, y would have to be -4 when using x=-3 in the function. but y = -31 for x= -3.
To prove a quadrilateral<span> is a </span>parallelogram<span>, you must use one of these five ways. </span>Prove that<span> both pairs of opposite sides </span>are<span> parallel. </span>Prove that<span> both pairs of opposite sides </span>are<span> congruent.</span>Prove that<span> one pair of opposite sides is both congruent </span>and<span> parallel. </span>Prove that<span> the diagonals bisect each other.</span>
0≤h(t)≤144, which means that the height of the object can be between 0 and 144 feet, including those limits.
Answer:
This is the best solution for your question
9514 1404 393
Explanation:
Make use of the properties of equality.
a = 2b +6 . . . . . given
a = 9b -8 . . . . . given
2b +6 = 9b -8 . . . . . . . substitution property of equality
6 = 7b -8 . . . . . . . . . . . subtraction property of equality
14 = 7b . . . . . . . . . . . . . addition property of equality
2 = b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . division property of equality
b = 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . symmetric property of equality
