Stagflation is a condition in which both the unemployment rate and the inflation rate are high. Stagflation is characterised by slower economic development, low employment rates, and increased inflation rates. Stagflation is the occurrence of low economic growth, high unemployment.
In terms of economics, stagflation, sometimes known as recession-inflation, is a state in which unemployment is consistently high, the economy is growing slowly, and the inflation rate is high or rising. When inflation and economic stagnation coexist, this is known as stagflation. The economy is in a state of stagnation due to rising unemployment.
The term "stagflation" was first used in the 1970s, a period of both high inflation and rising unemployment. Stagflation wasn't commonly acknowledged until the middle of the 20th century.
To know more about stagflation, click here:-
brainly.com/question/28177756
#SPJ4
Answer: 9.09% ownership
Explanation:
Your current ownership of the shares in Webster Mills is 10% of 3 million.
That means that you own,
= 10% * 3 million
= 300,000 shares.
The new offering that the company is doing equates one right to each share of existing stock and is expected to raise $12 million in new financing at a cost of $40. The goal is to find out how many new shares this will add.
= 12,000,000/40
= 300,000 shares
This means that 300,000 new shares will be added.
There are already 3,000,000 shares outstanding and now there are 300,00 extra which would bring the total to,
= 3,000,000 + 300,000
= 3,300,000 outstanding shares.
Since you sold your rights then you still have shares but now your percentage of ownership will change because of the increase in outstanding shares.
Your ownership percentage is now,
= 300,000 shares (that you own) / 3,300,000 (new outstanding balance)
= 0.0909
= 9.09%
Your new ownership position is that you own 9.09% of Webster Mills.
Answer:
The correct solution is "6.09%".
Explanation:
Given:
Nominal rate,
= 6%
or,
= 0.06
As we know,
⇒ ![EAR = [(1+\frac{APR}{m} )^m]-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=EAR%20%3D%20%5B%281%2B%5Cfrac%7BAPR%7D%7Bm%7D%20%29%5Em%5D-1)
By substituting the values, we get
![=[(1+\frac{0.06}{2} )^2]-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5B%281%2B%5Cfrac%7B0.06%7D%7B2%7D%20%29%5E2%5D-1)
![=[(1+0.03 )^2]-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5B%281%2B0.03%20%29%5E2%5D-1)
(%)
When businesses raise the price of a needed product or service after a natural disaster, this is known as price gouging. Price gouging is something that businesses do after a natural disaster when they know consumers are going to need a specific product or service so they raise the price because they know people are going to buy it anyways. An example of this is when they raise gas prices after a natural disaster, knowing people still need gas.
Answer:
affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.
Explanation:
This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:
MV = PQ
- M = quantity of money
- V = velocity of money
- P = price level
- Q = quantity of goods
Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:
- the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
- real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
- causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)
