Answer:
Type I: 1.9%, Type II: 1.6%
Step-by-step explanation:
given null hypothesis
H0=the individual has not taken steroids.
type 1 error-falsely rejecting the null hypothesis
⇒ actually the null hypothesis is true⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
but we rejected it ⇒our prediction is the individual has taken steroids.
typr II error- not rejecting null hypothesis when it has to be rejected
⇒actually null hypothesis is false ⇒the individual has taken steroids.
but we didnt reject⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
let us denote
the individual has taken steroids by 1
the individual has not taken steroids.by 0
predicted
1 0
actual 1 98.4% 1.6%
0 1.9% 98.1%
so for type 1 error
actual-0
predicted-1
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.9%=0.019
so for type II error
actual-1
predicted-0
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.6%=0.016
Hopefully I drew what you described.
The 6.6 represents the total of N + 3.4
We subtract the part we know from the whole /sum/total we know to get the other part.
So 6.6 - 3.4 = N
3.2 = N
The pick up fee is $2.50.
After each mile, $1.95 is added.
That is, after the first mile, we have;

Isaac total charge = $27.46;
Generally, let the number of miles driven by the taxi be x, then we have;

Solving for the number of miles Isaac travelled, we have;

CORRECT OPTION: