Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon.
Answer:
The statement that is true is: a. Fighting words are unprotected speech under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
The freedom of speech, which is a right included in the Constitution of the United States, has his limitations. For instance, fighting words, which are words that are used to show disconfort or disagreement of some sort became unprotected. The First Amendment does not protect fighing words, and the governmen is allow to limit speech when words said can bring fighting or disturbance.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Judicial review is Necessary in the United states for a treaty.
More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review
Hope This Helped!
Answer:
Trade between two agents or countries allows the countries to enjoy a higher total output and level of consumption than what would have been possible domestically. ... Comparative advantage and opportunity costs determine the terms of trade for exchange under which mutually beneficial trade can occur.
Explanation:
Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.
<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>
Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.
In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.
Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."
Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896
