Answer:
It will increase the assets of the company by 1200000,it will increase the equity of the company by 1200000.
Explanation: A No-par value stock or shares is a share that doesn't have any stated or designated value stated in its certificate.
Assets are value yielding or money making investments or facilities of a business Organisation.
Equity is a term used in accounting and investments to refer to the total value of a company's shares or stock.
THE EFFECTS ON OGILVIE CORP. WILL BE THE WORTH OF THE NO PAR STOCK *NUMBER OF UNITS ISSUED WHICH WILL BE EQUAL TO $40*30,000UNITS OF SHARES
=$1,200000 WORTH OF MONEY TO BE DOCUMENTED IN BOTH THE ASSET AND THE EQUITY OF THE COMPANY.
Answer:
equitable relief
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
A lawyer refers to an individual who has obtained a law degree and is saddled with the responsibility of giving legal advice, initiate and execute lawsuits for his or her clients. These legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
An equitable relief also referred to as equitable remedy can be defined as judicial remedies granted to an aggrieved person by a court of equity, requiring that the other party act or refrain from indulging in a specific act because ordinary legal remedies couldn't provide the aggrieved party sufficient (adequate) restitution for an offense commited against him or her. Thus, an equitable relief (remedy) is an injunction granted by a court of equity requiring a party to a contract to either act (mandamus or specific performance) or refrain from indulging in a particular act.
In this context, when a court of competent jurisdiction awards or grants custody of a child to one parent rather than awarding it to the other, this is an example of equitable relief.
In conclusion, an equitable relief or remedy is typically a nonmonetary judgement granted by a court of equity when ordinary legal remedies fail to provide sufficient (adequate) restitution to an aggrieved party.
Answer:
$7073.68
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Worth of portfolio = $15,000
Amount invested in stock A = $6,000
Beta of stock A = 1.63
Beta of stock B = 0.95
Beta of portfolio = 1.10
Now,
Beta portfolio = ∑(Weight × Beta)
let the amount invested in Stock B be 'x'
thus,
1.10 = [($6,000 ÷ $15,000 ) × 1.63] + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
1.10 = 0.652 + [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
0.448 = [( x ÷ $15,000 ) × 0.95 ]
or
x = ( 0.448 × $15,000 ) ÷ 0.95
or
x = $7073.68
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The 0.01 percent of the deviation plus the 0.01 percent of the sales average is not enough to get to the $6,300 daily, which means that the factor of the increase sales is the advertising campaign.
I believe its B) the fourth and fifth
