There were more towns to trade with, more goods, and the slave market increased GREATLY and more spread of influence, Islam influence grew TREMENDOUSLY.
The miserable living conditions that existed in the slums of New York City in the 1880s are discussed in the summary of the passage.
Jacob Riis's book "How the Other Half Lives" was a documentary that was published in the 1880s that revealed the deplorable living conditions that existed in the slums of New York City. The author made a documentary on the slums, the immigrants who lived there, the maltreatment they endured, and the ailments they suffered from. Jacob was a police reporter who got acquainted with tenement life and, through his work, brought attention to the appalling situation of the people who lived there. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is How the Other Half Lives?</h3>
Generally, Jacob Riis's How the Other Half Lives was a groundbreaking piece of photography that documented the deplorable living conditions in New York City slums in the 1880s. The book was titled How the Other Half Lives. By bringing the slums to the attention of the upper and middle classes in New York City, it laid the groundwork for subsequent muckraking journalism.
In conclusion, Poor people in New York City's slums in the 1880s had appalling living circumstances, as described in the excerpt's synopsis. New York's slums in the 1880s were shown in "How the Other Half Lives," a documentary by Jacob Riis. The author spoke on the hardships individuals in slums encountered, including living conditions, immigration, abuse, and illness. As a police reporter, Jacob was able to see the deplorable conditions in which tenement dwellers often found themselves and bring this information to the public's notice.
Read more about How the Other Half Lives
brainly.com/question/4980740
#SPJ1
There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.
Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv
The person who had a greater impact on industrial development in the U.S., was <u>Samuel Slater</u> <em>(Who was born in England in June 9, 1768 and died in April 21, 1835)</em>, because He was a pioneer in the American Industrial Development that took the British textile technology and the machinery designs and brought them to the United States, and with that industrial system and the machines, he created the first textile factories of North america, and began a business in that industry with his sons. <u>And thanks to that, it was generated an increase and an enhance in the U.S. industrial development, which caused that U.S became in one of the most industrialized nation.</u> So for that reason, <u>Samuel Slater was known as the "Father of the American Factory System".</u>
But by other side, although Eli Whitney contributed to the U.S. Industrial Revolution with the invention of the cotton gin, however, he wasn't founded the pillars of the Industrial Development of the U.S., as Samuel Slater did it.
So, according to the previous, <u>the right answer is Samuel Slater.</u>
