We'll explore both relative<span> and numerical </span>dating<span> on our quest to understand the... ... Again, this doesn't </span>tell<span> them exactly how old the layers are, but it </span>does give<span> them an ... Fossil succession </span>can<span> be</span>used<span> to determine the </span>relative<span> ages of fossils</span><span>. ... </span>One<span> of the biggest jobs of a </span>geologist<span> is establishing the </span>absolute<span> age, in years,
</span>
Answer:
The water level of the ocean will change
The audience is experiencing narcotizing dysfunction if fails to take action after seeing prolonged reports on natural disasters or human rights violations.
<h3>What is narcotizing dysfunction?</h3>
This is the theory that has it that people may lose their apathy to certain issues based on the fact that the media is outspoken on those particular issues.
This theory tells is that people may begin to care less about certain issues that are serious because much light has been shed on those issues.
The audience has seen so much reports on the issues of natural disaster till they have started to show little concern about it.
Read more on human rights violations here:
brainly.com/question/1274113
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. Internal coherence demonstrates how the parts of a hypothesis are coherent, or rationally connected.
B. Internal coherence is important because if a theory has internal inconsistencies, then its assumptions cannot all be correct.
C. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
Internal coherence may be defined as a ability of the educators in the school or in a system to connect the resources and align them to carry an improvement strategy and also engaging them in collective learning. It also helps to use the learning to provide the students with a richer educational opportunities.
Internal Coherence is the extent to which a component ideas of any hypothesis are rationally connected.
Specific instances Reasoning was Bruce used when he argued that all U.S. state capitols have domes because in his travels he saw more than a dozen capitol buildings that had domes.
It is sometimes called multiple perspectives because the author accepts multiple positions as truth. Deductive reasoning moves from generalized principles known to be true to true and concrete conclusions.
Overestimate what is perceived or portrayed as “new”. For example: "If you're trying to lose weight, you should follow the latest dietary trends. They always do the best job." Underestimate what is perceived or painted as "old".
Deductive reasoning refers to arguments that derive details from what is already known and include syllogisms. The premises leading to the conclusion must be true and relevant for the argument to be valid.
Learn more about Specific instances here brainly.com/question/9448510
#SPJ4
