3 years ago

Why was a buildup of weapons big enough for mutually assured destruction seen as a way to preserve peace?

2 answers:

8 0

Answer:The knowledge that both sides would be destroyed in a war would prevent either side from starting hostilities.

Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago

4 0

The development of weapons sufficiently enormous for commonly guaranteed devastation seen as an approach to protect peace is on the grounds that the knowledge that both sides would absolutely be decimated in any hard and fast war would keep either side from beginning threats.

You might be interested in

What proved to be most important to both the United States and Soviet Union during the Cuban missile crisis?

Snezhnost [94]

Communication and the Hotline between the two

7 0

3 years ago

5.0 Points

Viefleur [7K]

Your answer would be d. a person who starts a cleaning supplies business. Hopes this helps and have a nice day!

5 0

3 years ago

In the mid-1960s, many public places were still segregated by race. There were “whites only” water fountains and restrooms, and

Yakvenalex [24]

Jim Crow laws were any of the laws that enforced racial segregation in the American South between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Which place is located in North Africa?

Evgesh-ka [11]

Mesopotamia was in Asia

Egypt is in North Africa

You answer is A. Egypt

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Woodrow wilson wanted germany divided true or false

jonny [76]

I think the answer is true