1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
3 years ago
10

Why was a buildup of weapons big enough for mutually assured destruction seen as a way to preserve peace?

History
2 answers:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:The knowledge that both sides would be destroyed in a war would prevent either side from starting hostilities.

Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
4 0
The development of weapons sufficiently enormous for commonly guaranteed devastation seen as an approach to protect peace is on the grounds that the knowledge that both sides would absolutely be decimated in any hard and fast war would keep either side from beginning threats.
You might be interested in
Describe German expansion and aggression during the 1930s and explain whether or not you think a policy of appeasement contribut
Margarita [4]

Answer:

the german exspansion was because the german people where angry at the treaty of versilles and the apeasment made Hitler think that no one would say no

explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
why the structure set up by the Great Compromise is still in effect today while the structure established by the Three-Fifth Com
Charra [1.4K]
<span>The Great was retained because it <span>merged proposals from large states and small states about congressional apportionment. Eventually, the main contribution was in defining the apportionment of the senate, and thus retaining a federal character in the constitution. It was proposed that the proportion of suffrage in the 1st. branch [house] should depend on the respective numbers of free people.  It added that for the second branch or Senate, each State should have no more than one vote.  Though this plan failed it was finally resolved and an amended version of this plan was included.  Benjamin Franklin made modifications so that each state big or small was represented in the senate.  The Three-Fifths Compromise was no longer retained because it focused whether or not to include slaves in the total population count and victory in the Civil War ended slavery making it null.</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Does the united states have a duty to fight for freedom in neighboring countries
olga2289 [7]
If other countries aren't willing to fight for them and they cant fight for themselves the United States probally would but no we dont have to 
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement is a main idea of Mesmerized?
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

It is D.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What was the upper class in the colonies called?
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

gentry

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was the lowell system different from the rhode island system?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did many Americans object to the Alien and Sedition Acts?
    13·1 answer
  • In which American colonies were cash crops rasied for sale or export?​
    9·1 answer
  • I need help with these 5 questions please and thank you..​
    9·1 answer
  • Introduction: Match the example to the type of public policy it represents.
    12·1 answer
  • Rosa parks famous quote
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the causes and consequences of ww2
    12·1 answer
  • The interaction between the various countries of the world is called
    12·2 answers
  • The ______ was fought with ideas, words, and money.<br> Please help ASAP! Please and thank you!
    13·1 answer
  • Question 1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!