Answer:I dont know
Explanation:
loyd is studying the effect of breakfast cereal on the health of rats. He suspects that the cereal may be unhealthy. He feeds rats various amounts of breakfast cereal over a six-week period. He weighs the rats using a digital lab balance at the beginning of the experiment and then again at the end of the experiment. Then, he calculates the change in weight.
When writing the conclusion of his report, Lloyd states that the breakfast cereal is not a healthy choice for school children since it causes them to gain weight unnecessarily.
What component of scientific argumentation is missing from Lloyds work?
graphs and tables in the written report
empirical data that supports his claim
appropriate equipment for use in the experiment
accurate measurements made during the experiment
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (I1 > I2).
Explanation:
Method for moment of inertia because of it's viewpoint including object at a mean distance "r" from the axis is,
⇒ mr²
<u>For Case 1:</u>
Let the length of a rod be "r".
The axis passes via the middle of that same rod so that the range from either the axis within each dumbbell becomes "".
Now,
Now total moment of inertia = sum of inertial moment due to all of the dumbbell
⇒
⇒
<u>For Case 2:</u>
Axis moves via one dumbbell because its range from either the axis becomes zero (0) and its impact is zero only at inertia as well as other dumbbell seems to be at a range "r" from either the axis
Now,
Total moment of inertia = moment of inertia of dumbbell at distance "r".
And now we can infer from this one,
⇒
So that "I1 > I2" is the right answer.
Answer:New technology can provide cleaner energy for the environment
Can also help clean the environment.
Explanation:
Which option is potentially environmental benefit of adopting a new technology?
Evan could also grow some plants in the light? I don't have a clue but that would be my guess :) No points needed
The question should be D: Non-repeating