Answer:
A, C
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's use a different benchmark for this: 1/2. Half of 5 is 2 1/2, so 3/5 is clearly <em>bigger</em> than 1/2 (since 3 is bigger than 2 1/2). Half of 3 is 1 1/2, so 1/3 is clearly <em>smaller</em> than a half (since 1 is smaller than 1 1/2). We have
1/3 < 1/2 < 3/5
Which, of course, implies that <em>1/3 is less than 3/5</em>, and by being smaller, <em>1/3 is closer to 0 than to 1</em>.
Answer:
22
Step-by-step explanation:
If x = 5, then plug 5 in for x .
3(5) + 7
15 + 7 = 22
Answer:
as written: 7x^2
perhaps intended: 7x^4
Step-by-step explanation:
As written, the Order of Operations specifies that the only denominator factor is 3, so the expression is interpreted as ...

___
Sometimes grouping of denominator factors is intended, but parentheses are not written as they should be. If the intention is ...
21x^3/(3x^-1)
then the simplification is ...

_____
The applicable rules of exponents are ...
(a^b)(a^c) = a^(b+c)
a^b/a^c = a^(b-c)
Let N be the number of items sold and p the price.
Since the variation is inverse, then the relation between N and p is:

For N=20000 and p = $9.5, we get the formula:

If p = 8.75, then the number of items sold can be computed using the formula:
Answer:
16x - 48y +24
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use the distributive property to expand:
- 8(2x - 6y + 3)
- 8 x 2x - 8 x 6y + 8 x 3
- 16x - 48y + 24
Hope this helps!!