The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
Answer:
Although many political changes occurred in and around 476 CE, many cultural and social functions of the Roman Empire continued. The end of the Roman Empire represents a slow decline reflecting a natural progression of society rather than an abrupt end of power.
Longitudinal thats what i heard my teacher say oncr
I think the answer is
Emigrants
Children that falls to the middle as well as late childhood would be described as in terms of psychological characteristics and traits compare with those younger children.
- Base, on Erikson's Theory of development, there is is personality development as individuals increase in age, which cones as a result of internal maturational plan as well as external societal demands.
- As children increases in age, they tends to be described in term of psychological characteristics and traits.
Therefore, development occur at every stage.
Learn more at:
brainly.com/question/24367718?referrer=searchResults
