I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. Before government approves a merger, companies must prove that the merger would lower the number of competitors in the market. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Answer:
The correct answer is a) $24,000
Explanation:
At the end of the year, Morgan still holds $140,000 of this merchandise
Lewis Inc. owns 40% of Morgan and applies the equity method
40% = 0.4
$140,000 x 40% = $56,000
Lewis buys inventory costing $400,000 and sells it to Morgan for $700,000.
$700,000 - $400,000 = $300,000
=$56,000 x ($300,000 ÷ $700,000)
=$56,000 x 0,428571429
= $24,000
Answer:
B) II & IV
II. The Agent of the Broker-Dealer would be allowed to provide a potential customer with such a sales piece or summary if it does not omit any relevant information that the client would need to determine if they would like to buy the security.
IV. The Agent of the Broker-Dealer, when creating a summary or sales piece, is required to present a fair and balanced presentation of all material information from the prospectus.
Explanation:
Under North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) rules, when an agent or a broker-dealer creates a summary sheet or sales piece, it must include a fair and balanced presentation of all the important and relevant information that their client may need to be able to make a decision as to whether or not they want to purchase the security. Obviously the client trusts his/her agent, but the client must be given all the information necessary for him/her to decide whether the agent's advice should be followed or not.
Answer:
Being appreciated by people.
Answer:
the questions seems to be incomplete, so I looked for similar ones:
the total benefit of the project is estimated at $18 x 170 = $3,060
the result is probably lower than expected because:
- this is an nonexcludable good, and it is nonrival in consumption
- the free rider problem occurs here
- college administrators should not carry out the project id they only base their decision on expected benefit
Explanation: