Answer:
<h2>Leah is actually wrong, because those rectangles are similar.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that similarity is about having proportional sides and congruent angles. When we have congruent sides, then those rectangles are congruent not similar.
In this case, to find the similarity, Leah should compare bases and heights thorugh division, because the ratio between heights and the ratio between bases must be equal. So, let's divide.
As you can observe, both ratios are equal.
Therefore, those rectangles are congruent.
Answer:
Here it is solved for rate:
log(1 + rate) = {log(total) -log(Principal)} ÷ Years
Let's work through your example:
log(1 + rate) = {log(6,680) -log(5,000)} / 6
log(1 + rate) = (3.8247764625 -3.6989700043) / 6
log(1 + rate) = 0.020967743
If we raise 10 to the 0.020967743 power
10^0.020967743 it produces 1 plus the rate
1 plus the rate = 10^0.020967743 = 1.0494644773
There fore the rate = .0494644773 which equals
4.94644773 per cent
Source: https://www.1728.org/compint2.htm
Step-by-step explanation:
Circumference = 2 x radius x PI
Circumference = 2 x 3.8 x 3.14
Circumference = 23.86
answer: the closest one is A. 23.8 FT.
List out all of the factors to 32.
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32
From the list, we either have 4 or 16 as our number.
Prime factorisation for 4 is 2 x 2 and prime factorisation for 16 is 2 x 2 x 2 x 2
Thus, that doesn't help our case.
Looking at our requirement: the sum of its digits is odd.
Well, 4 can be rewritten as 0 4 and its sum is even.
The sum for 1 + 6 is obviously odd, which means that 16 is the number.
Answer:
See attachment
Step-by-step explanation:
The given inequality is 
By the definition of the absolute value function, we obtain the compound inequality.
When we simplify we get:
The graph for the solution set is shown in the attachment
