Marketing processes the quesion is not complite
Suppose a $3 per-unit tax is placed on this good. the per-unit burden of the tax on sellers is $1 .
Explanation:
The demand curve and the production curve are cross-secting before the tax level reaches $4.
The supply curve moves to the left when the tax of $3 was levied, so that the new price payable by consumers is $6 where the new supply curve and the demand curve intersect, while the seller collects $3 where the original supply curve and the demand curve intersects.
hence, the per unit burden of the tax imposed on buyers is $6 - $4 = $2
while the burden on sellers is $4 - $3 = $1
Answer:
the cost to repair your vehicle, as well as all damage to other vehicles involved in the accident.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, executory contract, etc.
A foreseeable damage can be defined as a any form of damage that the parties to a contract knew or took note of at the time when they were signing an agreement to the contract. Thus, it is the ability of an individual to reasonably anticipate the likelihood of damage or potential injury in a given circumstance such as an accident.
This ultimately implies that, foreseeable damages involves the ability of a reasonable individual to anticipate the potential results of his or her actions such as damage or injury to another person due to the refusal to repair a faulty car.
An example of foreseeable damages from a faulty repair of your car that led to an accident would be the cost to repair your vehicle, payment of hospital bill for the injured, including the damage to other vehicles that were involved in the car accident.
Answer:
Number of equivalent units= 18,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Conversion costs for Department B were 50% complete concerning the 6,000 units in the beginning work in process and 75% complete for the 8,000 units in the ending work in process. A total of 12,000 units were completed and transferred out of Department B during February.
With the information provided, we can calculate the number of equivalent units of the period.
Beginning work in process = 6,000*0.5= 3,000
Units started and completed = 12,000 - 3,000= 9,000
Ending work in process completed= 8,000*0.75= 6,000
Number of equivalent units= 18,000
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
