The answer would be cholera I believe!
Answer: B. maritime trade networks
The Chola dynasty was one of the longest-reigning ones in the Indian subcontinent. They were originally from the Tamil area, around the Kaveri River. Their reign represented the height of Indian sea power.
The empire owes most of its success to their excellence in foreign trade and maritime activity. They played a major role in regional and overseas trade, and expanded their influence all the way to China and Southeast Asia. The Tang dynasty of China, the Srivijaya empire and the Abbasid Caliphate at Baghdad were their main trading partners.
Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
Rights that are “essential to the concept of ordered liberty” are referred to as "fundamental rights".
They are usually comprehended as basic, key rights to which a man is innately entitled basically in light of the fact that she or he is a human and which are “inherent in every single individual", paying little heed to their country, area, dialect, religion, ethnic source or some other status.
<span>Countries that are likely to provide such personal information upon being asked to themselves would be countries that are individualistic. Individualistic nations are typically western nations and would include Germany and Ireland.</span>
