1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prisoha [69]
3 years ago
11

4. Find the shaded area of the figure below.

Mathematics
2 answers:
andriy [413]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer is c
Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago
3 0
Answer is 42.5 sq cm
You might be interested in
A construction crew has repaired 1.37 miles of a highway. The total length of the highway to be repaired is 7.9. How many miles
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

Part A: m+1.37=7.9

Part B: 6.53 miles are left to be repaired.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Length of repaired part = 1.37 miles

Total length to be repaired = 7.9 miles

Miles left to be repaired = m

Part A:

Create an equation to show the relationship between the number of miles repaired and the number of miles left to be repaired, m.

Miles left to be repaired + Length of repaired part = Total length to be repaired

m+1.37=7.9

Part B

How many miles are left to be repaired?

Subtracting 1.37 from both sides

6.53 miles are left to be repaired.

Keywords: length, subtraction

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
56 - (n + 4) For n = 44
loris [4]
Pretty sure the answer is 8
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which of the following
Harrizon [31]

(-19,7) (4, 15) hshw wjwhw

8 0
2 years ago
A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of
Elis [28]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933  

p_v =P(Z  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given \alpha=0.02 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X represent the number of arrests that were not prosecuted.

\hat p=0.27 estimated proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted

p_o=0.31 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.02 represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.31.:  

Null hypothesis:p\geq 0.31  

Alternative hypothesis:p < 0.31  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.02. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given \alpha=0.02 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.  

3 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=180%20%5Cdiv%20460%20%3D%20simplified%20%5C%3A%20fraction" id="TexFormula1" title="180 \div 46
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

first you would put the expression in a fraction for

180/460

you already know that the both numbers are divisible by 2

  • so the answer would be 90/230 but we are still no done because these values are divisible by three

the rule to prove that the number is divisible by three is when you add the digits of the number for example 333. 3+3+3=9 and nine is divisible by nine

THE ANSWER IS:::::::: 90/230


5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the center<br> (x + 9)^2+ y^2= 64
    14·2 answers
  • Pi times seventeen equals forty-seven
    13·1 answer
  • Find the next three terms of the sequence?
    13·1 answer
  • A number that is at least 90
    8·2 answers
  • Titus had 1/2 can of paint. He used 2/3 to paint a tabletop. What fraction of a full can of paint did Titus use?
    7·1 answer
  • A triangle has angle measures of 30 degrees and 70 degrees. What is the measure of the third angle?
    13·1 answer
  • Help me please ?? ASAP!!
    5·2 answers
  • Which numbers are solutions of the inequality? X &lt; –8; –10, –5, 0 –10 –10, –5, and 0 0 –5 and
    5·1 answer
  • Consider the expression 150 + 150(2.5). Which statements are correct?
    9·2 answers
  • In which hundredth interval of the number line does 84. Lie
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!