Answer:
Women have decided to speak.
Explanation:
Many decades ago, women were treated like objects, to serve the purpose. Not many nations considered women equal in society. That is why women decided to change this.
The principal reason for women to speak was to finally get someone to listen. As no one wanted to listen to only one woman, they have started to gather. When women gathered, they were collaborating, listening, passing the prejudices to come to a solution.
Women are not like men, they are different, they do things differently and that should be the point of their war to be noticed in the world. Women spoke, and transpassing the fear of silence, evoked many changes.
Answer:
It was held by the Court that parts of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 were unconstitutional because they exceeded the powers granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Explanation:
In 1994, Christy Brzonkala alleged that she was raped by Antonio Morrison and James Crawford, in which she filed a complaint under Virginia Tech's Sexual Assault Policy. While Morrison was later found guilty with immediate suspension of two semesters, and Crawford was not punished. Brzonkala later filed another complaint against Morrison, Crawford and Virginia Tech in Federal district court, alleging that, Morrison's and Crawford's attack violated 42 USC section 13981, part of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA), which provides a federal civil remedy for the victims of gender-motivated violence.
However, Morrison and Crawford, moved to dismiss Brzonkala's suit on the ground that section 13981's civil remedy was unconstitutional
