Answer:
x = 5, x = -7
Step-by-step explanation:
If you mean find the roots, then x = 5 and x = -7
Because roots makes the equation equal to 0 and 5 - 5 = 0 and -7 + 7 = 0
The object compresses the spring up to 0.8577m.
<h3>What is Potential Energy?</h3>
Potential Energy is the energy possessed by an object at rest.
The object is falling from the rest and it is assumed that the friction on the ramp is zero and the air resistance is also considered to be zero so only the gravitational force acts and the total potential energy gets converted to Kinetic Energy.
The total amount of potential energy at the top of the ramp is given by
Ep=mgh
Ep=3 * 9.81 *5
Ep=147.15 Joules
This is equal to kinetic energy.
From the formula for elastic potential energy
The distance up to which the spring is compressed is determined
The force constant = 400N/m
147.15 =(1/2)k(x²)
294.3=(400)(x²)
0.73575=x²
x=0.8577 m
So, the object compresses the spring up to 0.8577m.
- When the object compresses the spring, the potential energy of the spring is converted into Kinetic Energy so it will push the object back again.
To know more about Potential Energy
brainly.com/question/24284560
#SPJ1
Answer:
5/12
Step-by-step explanation:
15 students went to hear the doctor speak and 21 students went to other sessions
How many students are there? 15 + 21 = 36 students
Therefore, the probability to randomly select a student that went to hear the doctor is 
, then simplifying it by 3 is 
.
If we want to express it in percentage it would be 41.6%
![\bf \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{63}}{4\sqrt[4]{6}}\qquad \begin{cases} 63=3\cdot 3\cdot 7\\ 6=2\cdot 3 \end{cases}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 3}}\implies \cfrac{\underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}\cdot \sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \underline{\sqrt[4]{3}}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3}\cdot \sqrt[4]{7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{3\cdot 7}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B63%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B6%7D%7D%5Cqquad%20%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0A63%3D3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%5C%5C%0A6%3D2%5Ccdot%203%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%203%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cunderline%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B7%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B3%5Ccdot%207%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D)
![\bf \textit{now, rationalizing the denominator}\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}}\cdot \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}{\sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21}\cdot \sqrt[4]{8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot \sqrt[4]{2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{21\cdot 8}}{4\sqrt[4]{2\cdot 2^3}}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\sqrt[4]{2^4}} \\\\\\ \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{4\cdot 2}\implies \cfrac{\sqrt[4]{168}}{8}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bnow%2C%20rationalizing%20the%20denominator%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B8%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B21%5Ccdot%208%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5Ccdot%202%5E3%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2%5E4%7D%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B4%5Ccdot%202%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B168%7D%7D%7B8%7D)
and is all you can simplify from it.
so... all we did, was rationaliize it, namely, "getting rid of the pesky radical at the bottom", we do so by simply multiplying it by something that will raise the radicand, to the same degree as the root, thus the radicand comes out.
Answer and Explanation:
The Prolog rule expresses that logical implication (:-) describes the relationship between facts.
Prolog expressions are containing truth-functional symbols, which have the same intervention as in predicate calculus.
For example:
English Predicate calculus prolog
and ^ ,
or v ;
By using information, given in the question,
We can make prolog:
Grandfather(X, Y) :-mother(M,Y), father(X,M); father (F, Y), father(X,F)
Prolog (:- ) means define,
Prolog (,) represents a conjunction
And
Prolog (;) represent a disjunction
