No, it is not. If you see closely, the number 5.2 is not 52. 60 is greater than 5.2.
I'd suggest using "elimination by addition and subtraction" here, altho' there are other approaches (such as matrices, substitution, etc.).
Note that if you add the 3rd equation to the second, the x terms cancel out, and you are left with the system
- y + 3z = -2
y + z = -2
-----------------
4z = -4, so z = -1.
Next, multiply the 3rd equation by 2: You'll get -2x + 2y + 2z = -2.
Add this result to the first equation. The 2x terms will cancel, leaving you with the system
2y + 2z = -2
y + z = 4
This would be a good time to subst. -1 for z. We then get:
-2y - 2 = -2. Then y must be 0. y = 0.
Now subst. -1 for z and 0 for y in any of the original equations.
For example, x - (-1) + 3(0) = -2, so x + 1 = -2, or x = -3.
Then a tentative solution is (-3, -1, 0).
It's very important that you ensure that this satisfies all 3 of the originale quations.
<h2>Here we go ~ </h2>
According to given figure,
[ By linear pair ]
now, we can see that :
[ By Exterior angle property of Triangle ]
Answer:
Step 2:
Part A
f(x) = a(x-h)^2 +k
Part B
I'm not really sure about this part
Part C
f(x)=-12/25(x-25)^2+32
Step 3:
Part A
y = ax^2 + bx + c
Part B
f(x) = -12/25(x - 25)^2 + 32
Part C
a = -12/25
b = 0
c = 32
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope This Helps!
Sorry For Taking So Long!
