You need to start calculating from the innermost bracket and if there are no signs to do any operation then you need to multiply
There are 2 chances out of 6 to win $3
Every 6 rolls you are expected to win $6
Every 3 rolls you are expected to win $3.
On average, even though it's impossible, every roll you would make $1.
Answer:
x = 13 smaller integer
x + 2 = 15 the other integer
Step-by-step explanation:
x = the smaller integer
x + 2 = the next integer
7(x) = 61 + 2(x + 2)
7x = 61 + 2x +4
5x = 61 + 4
5x = 65
x = 13 smaller integer
x + 2 = 15 the other integer
Answer:
<u>CIRCLE : CIRCLE</u>
Ratio of area is the scale factor squared. So find the radii of the two circles, square both values, and simplify the ratio.
<u>SQUARE : SQUARE</u>
Ratio of area is the scale factor squared, So find the side lengths of the two squares, square both values, and simplify the ratio.
<u>SQUARE : CIRCLE</u>
Using the formulas A = s*s and A = pi*r^2, find the areas of the circle and the square. Then simplify the ratio.
Answer: Choice A) An economic theory that is shared by the discipline of Psychology
Through the research I've found so far, the articles mention that economic choices have a psychological link. This is because economics is basically the study of human psychology (more or less) in terms of how to allocate resources and how best to use them. The law of diminishing marginal utility is basically the idea where the concept "more is always better" is simply not true. An example would be that you are at a restaurant and there's an endless buffet. The food isn't infinite and neither is the capacity of your stomach. After a certain point, you'll find that eating another burger isn't as satisfying as eating the first few burgers. You can think of it as a graph where the curve may start with a sharp increase, but eventually it levels off.
Side note: The term "affective habituation" may be used in psychology textbooks as something very similar to the law of diminishing marginal utility.
