Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Using the Gordon Growth Model, we can adequately demonstrate that the dividend and price of a share are both components of the cashflow to be considered in share valuation.
Price per share is found to be D(1) / (r - g)
where:
Do = Dividend now
D1 = Dividend in year 1
g = growth
r = required return
So we see that the market price of a share which determines the market capitalization of a company is predicted by a growth in dividends. So the benefits of holding a share will not only depend on how much the share is sold now as against how much it can be sold in the future (in order to make a gain), but also how much you can be earning until such sale occurs.
Answer:
a. $28.5
b. 12.28%
c. $29.18
d. 13.09%
Explanation:
a. let current price = p
p*1.10 = 2(1-0.3)+30
= 1.4+30/1.10
= 31.4/1.10
= 28.5
the current price of the stock is approximately 28.5 dollars
b. (30+2 /28.5)-1
= 32/28.5 - 1
= 0.1228
= 12.28%
expected before tax rate is 12.28%
c. 3(1-0.3)+30 / 1.10
= 3*0.7+30/1.10
= $29.18
d. before tax rate of return
= (3$ + 30-29.18)/29.18
= 0.1309
= 13.09%
it is now higher here given that given that a greater dividend causes more tax burden.
The statement that would describe the shift from D1 to D2 is Demand for the product increased.
<h3>Why was there a shift from D1 to D2?</h3>
D2 is a curve that is to the right of D1 which means that it represents a higher level of demand for goods and services.
This means that for the demand to move from D1 to D2, there must have been an increase in the demand for the good or service and this could have been for any number of reasons including a reduction in the price of complimentary goods.
Find out more on determinants of demand at brainly.com/question/1245771
#SPJ1
Answer:
Positive deviance
Explanation:
Positive deviance is a methodology that is used by individuals who are associated with Eco-terrorism. They utilize radical criminal acts to spread their ecological philosophies. These individuals generally look for ratification of other people who share similar philosophies. These criminals believe that they will be viewed as heroes, and their actions will be seen as positive deviance.
Answer:
The answer to both a and b is in the explanation below
Explanation:
a) The increase in wage can either decrease or increase the hours worked. This is became an increase in wage has both substitution effect and income effect that work in different directions. Substitution effect An increase in wage increases the opportunity cost of leisure, thereby making the worker increase number of hours worked. Income effect The increase in wage also makers the worker richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
Since no information about worker's preferences is given, we do not Imow which effect will dominate the other effect and, therefore, we do not know what the net impact of the increase in wage will be.
b) The bonus will only have income effect. The bonus will make the workers richer, thereby making the worker decrease number of hours worked.
If in part a), the substitution effect and income effect are equal in magnitude, then there will be no change in the number of hours worked. The number of hours worked will remain the same at 2000 hours. Since the employer would be paying $5 extra on each hour worked, the cost to the employer of increase in wage would be $10,000 (=2000 x $5), which is the same as the bonus in part b).
