Answer:
The business judgement rule states that if the board takes decision in good faith and in best interest of the corporation considering the information available then its decision is not to be questioned by the courts. The courts can intervene only if there is any breach of good faith, due care or loyalty.
The above case is similar in facts with another case paramount vs time. In that case Time decided to merge with another company named Warner. Paramount also started bidding for Time but the directors of Time rejected their bid offer citing that warner merger would be more suitable for the company strategy.
Paramount then brought the case against Time in court.The court stated that the instant case was different from another case (REVLON VS MacAndrews) where Revlon was up for sale and hence it was necessary for the board to sell its assets to the highest bidder.
The answer is letter b, income and the wealth. The net worth is a way of having to measure the over all asset of the individual in which his or her income as well as his or her wealth that he or she has or acquires. The answer is letter b.
Answer:
B. 9.84%
Explanation:
Given that
D1 = 1.25
P0 = 27.50
g = 5%
F = 6%
Recall that
Cost of equity raised = (D1/P0 - [F × P0]) + g
Thus,
= 1.25/27.50 - [0.06 × 27.50] + 0.05
= 1.25/ 25.85 + 0.05
= 0.04835 + 0.05
= 0.09835
= 0.0984
=9.84%
Answer:If the firm had sharp seasonal sales patterns, or if it grew rapidly during the year, many ratios would most likely be distorted.
Explanation: Fluctuations in Economics patterns have distorting effects on the ratios of a company or an economy especially if the the seasonal patterns has been consistent for a certain period. THE VALIDITY OF MOST RATIOS ARE SEVERELY AFFECTED BY SHARP CHANGES WHICH MAKES ECONOMIC WATCHERS FEEL THE RATIOS ALREADY ANALYSED ARE NOT VALID.
A consistent flow pattern is desired in an economy and in business Organisation as it helps to give Economic watchers enough confidence in the ratios already existing.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is $36,000.
Explanation:
Given information -
Units anticipated to be produced - 300,000 units
Variable cost - $150,000
Fixed cost - $600,000
Beginning inventory - 5000 units
Ending inventory - 7000 units
Income under absorption costing - $40,000
Now under the absorption costing, rate of fixed overhead cost per unit -
Fixed cost / Number of units produced
= $600,000 / 300,000
= $2
In April ( under absorption costing ), the amount of fixed manufacturing overhead cost that was still embedded in ending inventory but were not expense -
Fixed overhead rate per unit x number of units produced but not sold
= $2 x 2000 ( 7000 units - 5000 units )
= $4000
So when we calculate the operating cost under variable costing this fixed overhead cost wold be subtracted from total income -
$40,000 - $4000
= $36,000 .
