As with many cultures, a person’s quality of life depended in many ways on their rank within the social structure.
Two Romans living at the same time in the same city could have very different lives.
Rich…
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses –
often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They
enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded
by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold
exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the
day.
…and poor
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out
in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse
or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn
babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a
servant or slave.
Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who
relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things
in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a
man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He
alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and
who they would marry.
There were other traditions that all Romans shared. Whatever their
individual circumstances, all Romans observed certain practices at
dinner time, the main meal of the day. Although they might eat very
different food, they ate it in roughly the same way.
And Romans of all classes made a point of visiting the baths
after work each day. There they would mix freely with their fellow
citizens, exercising, washing and chatting. To citizens, the baths made
them feel superior to the rest of the world – they made them feel Roman.
The U.S. Women soccer team filed lawsuit because of the gender discrimination and inequitable compensation to players.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Players on the U.S. ladies' national group are looking for more than $66 million in harms as a feature of their sexual orientation separation claim against the U.S. Soccer Federation. The harms were remembered for slew of papers recorded Thursday night in U.S. Region Court in Los Angeles in front of a preliminary planned to begin May 5.
The U.S. soccer team alleged standardized sexual orientation segregation that incorporates discriminatory pay contrasted with players on the men's national group.
Factors that contributed to the shrinkage of the average working week were restrictions on working hours and changes in age and retirement laws.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Industrialized nations have a very low unemployment rate, in addition to having a stable and efficient economy.
For this reason, these nations realized that promoting restrictions on working hours, allowing workers to work shorter hours, would promote improvements in the industry and the economy.
These restrictions reduced the average workweek, but allowed workers to be more rested and become more productive, improving industrial production.
It also allowed for changes in age and retirement laws, allowing people to retire earlier, or later in some cases.
The result of the shortening of the average working week brought social and economic benefits, allowing these nations to become stronger and have good economic production.
Explanation:The image is from the collection of the N.C. Museum of History. ... Corn and tobacco were two of the most important crops for the ... In the 1700s and early 1800s, farm machinery as we know it today didn't exist. ... The department oversaw farming all over the state to help improve how ... How to use NCpedia.
