Answer:
the net income is $92,800
Explanation:
The computation of the net income is given below:
Net income is
= Sales - cost of goods sold - tax rate on the remaining balance left
= $520,000 - $375,000 - (($520,000 - $375,000) ×0.36)
= $145,000 - $145,000 × 0.36
= $145,000 - $52,200
= $92,800
Hence, the net income is $92,800
<u>Answer:
</u>
We can expect to see a large change in the quantity demanded for Good A.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- As the price change in the price of good B is inelastic, it is but clear that the price of good B would not show any fluctuations even if there is an increase or decrease in the demand for good B.
- As the price of good B is not subject to decrease in the near future, it can be expected that the demand for good A would exhibit a sudden rise.
The correct answer is Physical Activity Level.
Physical Activity Level or also known as PAL is best described as a way to explicit a person's daily physical hobby as quite a number, and is used to estimate a person's overall strength expenditure. In combination with the basal metabolic rate, it could be used to compute the amount of food power someone needs to eat so as to keep a selected way of life.
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.