Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
3/5
Step-by-step explanation:
I took the test
Answer:
The First Image
Step-by-step explanation:
A dilation is a type of transformation that enlarges or reduces a figure, therefore in the first Image we see an increase in scale factor of 2.
5(3 +x) – 2 = (5+3)*(5+x)
(8-2)*(5x-2)
6*5x-2
this Is what I came up with.
Answer:
86
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Perimeter of WXY = WSY+WRX+XY</u>
<em>--> WSY = SY x 2</em>
--> WSY = 16 x 2 = 32
<em>Since it is an isosceles triangle, WRX = WSY</em>
--> WRX = 32
<em>--> Draw a straight line from W to XY to divide it into two halves assuming it to be point A. This would form a right angle triangle of WAX.</em>
<em>--> Solve it using the cos theta rule</em>
--> Angle = Angle X = 70°
Hypotenuse = WRX = 32
Adjacent = WA = ?
<em>--> Cos (Angle) = Adjacent/Hypotenuse</em>
Cos (70) = WA/32
WA = 10.9 rounded off to 11
--> WA=AY= 11
--> XY = WA + AY = 11+11 = 22
<em>--> Perimeter = WSY+WRX+XY</em>
Perimeter = 32+32+22
Perimeter = 86
Therefore, the perimeter of WXY is 86.
