Answer: A. maximizes the profits from money management.
Explanation:
The optimal average level of money is indeed the amount that maximises profit from money management.
Money management is essentially taking charge of your money and ensuring that you manage it in such a way as to limit unnecessary expenses whilst growing money through measures such as budgeting, investing and expenses tracking.
With Mr Peabody's income and other financial constraints, the optimal average level of money will be the most he can maximise from managing his money.
Answer:
A. Actual Sales - Break-even sales
Explanation:
In business studies, Margin of safety (MOS) is the difference between actual/projected/budgeted sales and the level of break even sales. It is calculated by subtracting break even sales from projected or budgeted sales.
It is usually calculated by a company to know the level of percentage by which sales can drop in that company, before they start incurring losses. IT IS A MEASURE OF BUSINESS RISK.
<span>unconditioned stimulus.
im not sure though </span>
Insurance is a method of defense when it comes to managing your money according to Dave because it prevents you from incurring more debt.
<h3>How does insurance defend your money?</h3>
According to Dave Ramsey, a defense method in managing your money is one that helps you reduce or avoid debt.
Insurance is therefore a defense for managing your money because it saves you from having to incur debt when you pass through a dangerous situation because the insurance will pay out instead of you having to borrow.
Find out more on the purpose of insurance at brainly.com/question/1941778.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Both Laura and Cassie are correct.
Explanation:
Since Laura says that the present value of $ 700 to be received one year from today if the interest rate is 6 percent is less than the present value of $ 700 to be received two years from today if the interest rate is 3 percent, and Cassie says that $ 700 saved for one year at 6 percent interest has a smaller future value than $ 700 saved for two years at 3 percent interest, to determine who is right, the following calculations must be performed:
700 x 1.06 = 742
700 x 1.03 ^ 2 = 742.63
Therefore, both Laura and Cassie are correct in their claims.
